Table 2 Cluster Statistic for Districts with the High Rates in 2015 Tainan and Kaohsiung Combined
From: Recognizing spatial and temporal clustering patterns of dengue outbreaks in Taiwan
Cityb | District | Ratea | Rank Order | Risk Level | Statistic B | P-value* | P-value** |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | West Central | 4497 | 1 | 1 | |||
0 | North | 4313 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0.066183 | 0.063869 |
0 | South | 2785 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0.008758 | 0.017360 |
0 | East | 1673 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 0.000121← | 0.000059 |
1 | Qianzhen | 1415 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 0.000706 | 0.000621 |
0 | Anping | 1401 | 6 | 2 | 7 | 0.000077← | 0.000080 |
1 | Sanmin | 1350 | 7 | 3 | 7 | 0.000561 | 0.000610 |
1 | Lingya | 1290 | 8 | 3 | 9 | 0.000126 | – |
1 | Qianjin | 1187 | 9 | 3 | 11 | 0.000030 | – |
0 | Yongkang | 1159 | 10 | 3 | 13 | 0.000011 | – |
1 | Yancheng | 1107 | 11 | 3 | 16 | 0.000001 | – |
1 | Gushan | 1000 | 12 | 3 | 18 | < 10−6 | – |
0 | Annan | 984 | 13 | 3 | 22 | < 10−6 | – |
1 | Xinxing | 908 | 14 | 3 | 25 | < 10−6 | – |