Skip to main content

Table 2 Patient and facility characteristics in relation to retention in carea

From: Assessing linkage to and retention in care among HIV patients in Uganda and identifying opportunities for health systems strengthening: a descriptive study

Characteristic

N

N (%) retained in care

Univariate OR (95% CI)

p-value

Multivariate OR (95% CI)

p-value

Sex

 Female

408

69.4%

0.75 (0.58-0.97)

0.03

0.76 (0.60-0.97)

0.03

 Male

270

75.2%

Ref

 

Ref

 

Age group

  < 10 years

30

73.3%

1.08 (0.41-2.84)

0.87

1.12 (0.41-3.03)

0.83

 10-18 years

20

50.0%

0.39 (0.16-0.99)

0.05

0.43 (0.17-1.06)

0.07

 19-48 years

541

71.7%

Ref

 

Ref

 

 49+ years

64

79.7%

1.55 (0.79-3.04)

0.21

1.46 (0.75-2.85)

0.26

 Missing

23

65.2%

0.74 (0.47-1.16)

0.19

0.83 (0.46-1.49)

0.53

Facility location

 Rural/remote (n = 14)

389

67.6%

0.62 (0.41-0.93)

0.02

0.62 (0.39-0.98)

0.04

 Semi−/peri-urban (n = 6)

289

77.2%

Ref

 

Ref

 

Facility size of expert client staff pool

 1 or fewer (n = 3)

25

64.0%

0.62 (0.41-0.94)

0.03

0.82 (0.52-1.28)

0.37

 2-4 (n = 9)

328

69.8%

0.81 (0.49-1.33)

0.40

0.86 (0.56-1.33)

0.50

 5+ (n = 8)

325

74.2%

Ref

 

Ref

 

Facility level

 III (n = 9)

189

70.9%

0.95 (0.63-1.42)

0.80

–

 

 IV (n = 11)

489

72.0%

Ref

 

–

 

Days ART offered per week

 1 (n = 9)

185

67.6%

0.72 (0.48-1.08)

0.11

–

 

 2-3 (n = 8)

380

72.9%

0.93 (0.54-1.60)

0.79

–

 

 4-5 (n = 3)

113

74.3%

Ref

 

–

 
  1. aRetention in care measured at 6 months among 678 patients newly initiated on ART at 20 facilities in Uganda. Logistic regression models used cluster-robust standard errors to account for clustering by health facility. Variables that were statistically significant in univariate models were included in the multivariable models