Table 3 Determinants of opting out of HIV screening as compared to not being screened for unknown reasons in 307 smear positive tuberculosis patients not screened for HIV, San Juan de Lurigancho 2010–2011
From: HIV screening among newly diagnosed TB patients: a cross sectional study in Lima, Peru
Characteristics | Opted out of screening N (%) | Not screened for unknown reasons N (%) | Crude OR (95% CI) | p | Adjusted OR (95%CI) | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sex | ||||||
Female | 39 (36.2%) | 69 (63.8%) | 1 | |||
Male | 79 (39.5%) | 121 (60.5%) | 1.14 (0.70–1.85) | 0.595 | ||
Age, in years | ||||||
18–34 | 83 (37.7%) | 137 (62.27%) | 1.04 (0.58–1.84) | 0761 | ||
35–49 | 24 (36.9%) | 41(63.1%) | 1 | |||
> 50 | 10 (45.5%) | 12 (54.5%) | 1.42 (0.53–3.79) | |||
Weight loss reported by the patient | ||||||
Yes | 94 (36.7%) | 162 (63.3%) | 0.67 (0.37–1.22) | 0.194 | ||
No | 24 (46,2%) | 28 (53.8%) | 1 | |||
Location of health facility in district area | ||||||
Lowest area | 8 (24.2%) | 25 (75.8%) | 1 | 1 | ||
Middle area | 12 (25.5%) | 35 (74.5%) | 1.07 (0.38–3.00) | 0.022 | 1.21 (0.42–3.49) | |
Highest area | 63 (46.3%) | 73 (53.7%) | 2.65 (1.12–6.30) | 3.28 (1.32–8.18) | ||
High area | 35 (38.0%) | 57 (62.0%) | 1.92 (0.78–4.72) | 2.18 (0.86–5.56) | ||
Education | ||||||
Primary or less | 60 (40.8%) | 87 (59.2%) | 1.28 (0.76–2.16) | 0.627 | ||
High School | 36 (35%) | 67 (65.0%) | 1 | |||
Higher | 22 (37.9%) | 36 (62.1%) | 1.09 (0.55–2.13) | |||
Marital Status | ||||||
Married / cohabiting | 53 (44.9%) | 65 (55.1%) | 1.44 (0.88–2.35) | 0.219 | ||
Divorced | 5 (23.8%) | 16 (76.2%) | 0.56 (0.20–1.62) | |||
Single | 56 (35.7%) | 101 (64.3%) | 1 | |||
Widow | 4 (33.3%) | 8 (66.7%) | 0.90 (0.26–3.13) | |||
Illegal drug consumption | ||||||
Yes | 19 (27.5%) | 50 (72.5%) | 0.54 (0.30–0.98) | 0.037 | 0.43 (0.23–0.80) | |
No | 99 (41.4%) | 140 (58.6%) | 1 | |||
Alcohol consumption (CAGE score) | ||||||
Yes | 7 (35.0%) | 13 (65.0%) | 0.74 (0.29–1.88) | 0.524 | ||
No | 68 (38.4%) | 109 (61.6%) | 1 | |||
Ex prison inmate | ||||||
Yes | 4 (46.7%) | 8 (53.3%) | 0.81 (0.24–2.74) | 0.726 | ||
No | 114 (38.5%) | 182 (61.5%) | 1 | |||
Diabetes Mellitus, as reports by the patient | ||||||
Yes | 5 (35.7%) | 9 (64.3%) | 0.90 (0.29–2.75) | 0.849 | ||
No | 113 (38.4%) | 181 (61.6%) | 1 | |||
TB regimen | ||||||
Regimen for drug sensitive TB | 116 (38.0%) | 189 (62.0%) | 1 | |||
Regimens for drug resistant TB | 2 (66.7%) | 1 (33.3%) | 3.29 (0.29–36.6) | 0.315 | ||
Employment | ||||||
Yes | 83 (37.6%) | 138 (62.4%) | 1 | |||
No | 21 (34.4%) | 40 (65.6%) | 0.88 (0.49–1.60) | 0.217 | ||
Student | 14 (53.8%) | 12 (46.2%) | 1.96 (0.87–4.45) | |||
Study Period | ||||||
1 | 34 (46.6%) | 39 (53.4%) | 1 | 1 | ||
2 | 28 (40.0%) | 42 (60.0%) | 0.79 (0.40–1.53) | 0.003 | 0.65 (0.33–1.31) | |
3 | 18 (22.0%) | 64 (78.0%) | 0.33 (0.17–0.67) | 0.23 (0.11–0.49) | ||
4 | 38 (45.8%) | 45 (54.2%) | 0.99 (0.53–1.88) | 0.71 (0.35–1.40) | ||
Place of birth | ||||||
Coastal region | 74 (39.0%) | 116 (61.0%) | 1 | |||
Jungle region | 19 (41.3%) | 27 (58.7%) | 1.10 (0.57–2.12) | 0.663 | ||
Andean region | 25 (34.7%) | 47 (65.3%) | 0.80 (0.45–1.42) | |||