Skip to main content

Table 2 Logistic regression modelling presented as Odds Ratio with 95% confidence interval and corresponding AUC

From: Empiric antibiotic therapy in urinary tract infection in patients with risk factors for antibiotic resistance in a German emergency department

Target

Nursing home residence

Hospitalization within 30 days

Male sex

Renal transplantation

Indwelling urinary catheter

Use of antibiotics within 30 days

Recurrent UTI

AUC

Pip/taz

n.s.

3.7 (1.4–9.5)**

n.s.

15.4 (1.4–172.1)*

n.s.

n.s.

n.s.

0.699

Ciprofloxacin

n.s.

4.4 (1.8–10.6)**

n.s.

n.s.

5.2 (1.8–14.7)**

n.s.

n.s.

0.749

Gentamicin

n.s.

n.s.

n.s.

24.8 (2.4–257.2)**

3.1 (1.0–9.4)*

n.s.

n.s.

0.650

Cefuroxime

n.s.

n.s.

7.3 (2.9–18.5)***

n.s.

n.s.

5.7 (1.8–17.7)**

n.s.

0.792

Cefpodoxime

n.s.

n.s.

6.5 (2.5–17.0)***

n.s.

n.s.

5.3 (1.7–16.3)**

n.s.

0.788

Ceftazidime

n.s.

n.s.

3.7 (1.3–10.6)*

16.4 (1..5–182.1)*

n.s.

n.s.

n.s.

0.715

MDR

n.s.

3.6 (1.5–8.5)**

n.s.

n.s.

n.s.

n.s.

4.0 (1.7–9.8)**

0.707

sCPC

22.8 (3.4–151.2)**

n.s.

9.5 (1.4–62.5)*

n.s.

n.s.

n.s.

n.s.

0.868

  1. * p < 0,05; ** P < 0,01; ***p < 0,001; n.s. not significant, UTI urinary tract infection, AUC Area under the curve, Pip/taz Piperacillin/Tazobactam, MDR multidrug resistance, sCPC simultaneous non-susceptibility for Pip/taz, Ciprofloxacin and Ceftazidime