Skip to main content

Table 1 Literature included in the report

From: Economic evaluation of HCV testing approaches in low and middle income countries

Author

Year

Report section

Country

Strategies

DAA or interferon

ICER

Citation

Castelnuovo

2006

Persons who inject drugs

UK

Compared focused case-finding to background testing

Interferon

16,514£/QALY

[10]

Selvapatt

2017

Persons who inject drugs

UK

Compared testing and treatment in a drug treatment unit to no testing and no treatment

DAA

1029£/QALY

[11]

Loubiere

2003

Persons who inject drugs

France

Compared testing with EIA to no testing

Interferon

3825€/QALY

[12]

Leal

1999

Persons who inject drugs

UK

Compared testing and treating PWID to no testing and no treatment

Interferon

9300£/QALY

[13]

Stein

2004

Persons who inject drugs

UK

Compared testing and treating PWID to no testing and no treatment

Interferon

28,000£/QALY

[14]

Thompson Coon

2006

Persons who inject drugs

UK

Compared focused case-finding to background testing

Interferon

16,000£/QALY

[15]

Schackman

2015

Persons who inject drugs

US

Compared on-site and off-site HCV testing offer in a substance abuse treatment program to no HCV testing offer

Both

18,300$/QALY

[16]

Cipriano

2012

Persons who inject drugs

US

Compared several different interval testing strategies for HCV and HIV compared to no testing

Interferon

168,600$/QALY

[17]

Martina

2013

Persons who inject drugs

UK

Compared dried blood spot HCV testing to no testing in addiction services

Interferon

14,600£/QALY

[18]

Martina

2013

People in prison

UK

Compared dried blood spot HCV testing to no testing in prison

Interferon

59,400£/QALY

[18]

Sutton

2008

People in prison

UK

Compared testing in prison to testing only in the community

Interferon

54,852£/QALY

[19]

Martin

2016

People in prison

UK

Compared increased case-finding in prisons to background testing

DAA

15,090£/QALY

[20]

He

2016

People in prison

US

Compared risk-based opt-out testing in prison to no testing

DAA

29,234$/QALY

[21]

Sutton

2006

People in prison

UK

Compared four case-finding scenarios on intake to prison to no case finding efforts

N/A

£6388/case identified

[22]

Linas

2012

HIV-infected MSM

US

Compared interval testing to symptom-based testing

Interferon

57,800$/QALY

[23]

Nakamura

2008

Birth cohort

Japan

Compared national testing programs to no testing, stratified by age group

Interferon

848$-4825$/QALY

[24]

Coffin

2012

Birth cohort

US

Compared testing of individuals born between 1945 and 1965 to general population testing

Interferon

5400$/QALY

[25]

McEwan

2013

Birth cohort

US

Compared testing of individuals born between 1945 and 1965 to risk-based testing

Interferon

28,602$/QALY

[26]

McGarry

2012

Birth cohort

US

Compared testing of individuals born between 1946 and 1970 to risk-based testing

Both

37,700$/QALY

[27]

Rein

2012

Birth cohort

US

Compared testing of individuals born between 1945 and 1965 to the standard of care

Both

35,700$/QALY

[28]

Liu

2013

Birth cohort

US

Compared testing of individuals aged 40–64 to no testing

Interferon

65,749$/QALY

[29]

Wong

2015

Birth cohort

Canada

Compared testing and treatment to no testing and no treatment in 45–64 year olds

Both

36,471$/QALY

[30]

Ruggeria

2013

Birth cohort

Italy

Compared testing to no testing, stratified by age

Interferon

1383–10,432€/QALY

[31]

Ruggeria

2013

General population

Italy

Compared testing to no testing

Interferon

5171€/QALY

[31]

Eckman

2013

General population

US

Compared testing and treatment to no testing or treatment

DAA

47,276$/QALY

[32]

Deuffic-Burban

2009

General population

France

Compared different follow-up schedules for detection of occupational HCV infection

Interferon

€2020/QALY

[33]

Miners

2014

General population

UK

Compared elevated testing of migrants to the UK to the current background rate of testing

Interferon

£23,200/QALY

[34]

Kim

2015

General population

Egypt

Compared testing and treatment to no testing or treatment

Both

Cost saving

[35]

  1. aArticles appearing twice contained sub-analyses covering multiple populations