Skip to main content

Table 3 Performance of CareStart™ by species identified in comparison to the standard reference light microscopy

From: Performance comparison of CareStart™ HRP2/pLDH combo rapid malaria test with light microscopy in north-western Tigray, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study

 

Pf or mixed by LM vs pf/pan by RDT

Non-Pf (by LM) vs Pan only (by RDT)

All positive by LM vs all positive by RDT

Sensitivity (%) (95% CI)

94.4 (94.3–94.5)

85.0 (84.8–85.2)

95.4 (95.3–96.0)

Specificity (%) (95% CI)

98.9 (98.8–99.0)

99.7 (99.5–100.0)

99.3 (99.2–99.4)

Positive predictive value (%) (95% CI)

85.0 (84.8–85.14)

89.5 (89.4–89.6)

99.6 (99.58–99.62)

Negative predictive value (%) (95% CI)

99.0 (98.9–99.04)

99.3 (99.2–99.4)

98.9 (89.8–90.0)

Agreement between tests Kappa

0.85 (0.76–0.91)

0.89 (0.78–0.93)

0.92 (0.80–0.93)

  1. Pf Plasmodium falciparum, LM light microscopy, RDT rapid diagnostic test