Skip to main content

Table 2 Proportion and crude prevalence ratio of heterosexual men who underwent HIV/STI testing in the past 6 months versus those who did not by various factors

From: What are the factors associated with human immunodeficiency virus/sexually transmitted infection screening behaviour among heterosexual men patronising entertainment establishments who engaged in casual or paid sex? – Results from a cross-sectional survey in an Asian urban setting

Factor

Gone for HIV/STI testing

Crude PR (95% CI)

P value

Yes (n = 163)

No (n = 441)

Sociodemographics

 Ethnicity

  Chinese

86 (22.8)

291 (77.2)

Referent

 

  Non-Chinese

77 (33.9)

150 (66.1)

1.49 (1.09–2.02)

0.01

 Marital status

  Single

129 (26.2)

363 (73.8)

Referent

 

  Married

34 (30.4)

78 (69.6)

1.16 (0.79–1.69)

0.45

 Highest education levela

  No formal education/primary/secondary

25 (27.8)

65 (72.2)

Referent

 

  Institute of technical education/A Level/ Diploma

83 (25.0)

249 (75.0)

0.90 (0.58–1.41)

0.64

  University/Post-graduate

54 (30.0)

126 (70.0)

1.08 (0.67–1.74)

0.75

 Housing type

  1–3 room public housing

22 (24.2)

69 (75.8)

Referent

 

  4–5 room public housing

91 (26.4)

254 (73.6)

1.09 (0.68–1.74)

0.71

  Private property

50 (29.8)

118 (70.2)

1.23 (0.75–2.03)

0.42

 Occupation

  Not currently employed

17 (16.7)

85 (83.3)

Referent

 

  Blue-collar job

44 (28.0)

113 (72.0)

1.68 (0.96–2.94)

0.07

  White-collar job

102 (29.6)

243 (70.4)

1.77 (1.06–2.96)

0.03

 Age in years, median (IQR)

27 (24–32)

26 (23–30)

1.02 (1.00–1.03)

0.11

HIV knowledge

 HIV-KQ-18 Knowledge Score, median (IQR)

15 (12–16)

13 (10–15)

1.10 (1.04–1.15)

0.001

Sexual behaviour

 Number of partners in the past 6 months, median (IQR)

5 (3–6)

4 (2–5)

1.04 (1.02–1.06)

<0.001

 Engaged in anal sex with casual or paid partner in the past 6 months

  No

117 (23.4)

383 (76.6)

Referent

 

  Yes

46 (44.2)

58 (55.8)

1.89 (1.34–2.66)

<0.001

 Type of casual/paid partners in the past 6 months

  More than 1 type of casual/paid partner

44 (28.2)

112 (71.8)

Referent

 

  Sex workers from brothels only

7 (25.9)

20 (74.1)

0.92 (0.41–2.04)

0.84

  Casual partners only

103 (27.8)

267 (72.2)

0.99 (0.69–1.40)

0.94

  Female entertainment workers only

9 (17.6)

42 (82.4)

0.63 (0.31–1.28)

0.20

 Type of regular partners in the past 6 months

  Without any regular partner

79 (23.9)

251 (76.1)

Referent

 

  With wife as regular partner only

17 (32.1)

36 (67.9)

1.34 (0.79–2.26)

0.27

  With girlfriend/mistress as regular partner only

58 (29.3)

140 (70.7)

1.22 (0.87–1.72)

0.24

  With both wife and girlfriend/mistress as regular partners

9 (39.1)

14 (60.9)

1.63 (0.82–3.26)

0.16

 Partner asking to use a condom all the time in the past 6 months

  No

80 (28.0)

206 (72.0)

Referent

 

  Yes

83 (26.1)

235 (73.9)

0.93 (0.69–1.27)

0.66

 Consistent condom use with casual or paid partner in the past 6 months

  No

80 (25.0)

240 (75.0)

Referent

 

  Yes

83 (29.2)

201 (70.8)

1.17 (0.86–1.59)

0.32

 Condom use at last sex with a casual or paid partner

  No

65 (27.1)

175 (72.9)

Referent

 

  Yes

98 (26.9)

266 (73.1)

0.99 (0.73–1.36)

0.97

  1. All figures in the table refer to frequency (row percentage) unless otherwise indicated
  2. aContains missing value of 2 for highest education level