Table 4 Relative proportion of Salmonella serotypes isolated from diarrheic patients in Addis Ababa and their resistance profile
Serotype | No. | An | Amp | Amc | C | Cro | Cf | Cip | Fox | Gm | K | Sxt | Tmp | Te | Su | S | Nitro | Na | N |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Braenderup | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Concord | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Enteritidis | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Kentucky | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
Kottbus | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
Miami | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Newport | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Sainpaul | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Typhimurium | 27 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 13 | 18 | 9 | 1 | 1 |
V:ROUGH-O;-:- | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Virchow | 21 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 14 | 11 | 10 | 3 |
Total | 67 | 0 | 11 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 23 | 3 | 3 | 9 | 26 | 50 | 27 | 16 | 9 |
(%) | 100 | 0 | 16.4 | 11.9 | 3 | 3 | 17.9 | 4.5 | 3 | 7.5 | 34.3 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 13.4 | 38.9 | 74.6 | 40.3 | 23.9 | 13.4 |