Skip to main content

Table 1 Analytical sensitivity and specificity showed by the different ELISA and IIF assays used by the participant laboratories

From: International external quality control assessment for the serological diagnosis of dengue infections

 

IgM sensitvity

IgM specificity

IgG sensitivity

IgG specificity

Overall*

66.7% (95% CI 62.3%-70.8%)

95.1% (95% CI 92.2%-97.2%)

84.4% (95% CI 80.6%-87.7%)

83% (95% CI 78%-87.1%)

ELISA assays

70.4% (95% CI 65.5%-75%)

97.2% (95% CI 94.4%-98.9%)

83.2% (95% CI 78.5%-87.3%)

83.8% (95% CI 78%-88.7%)

ELISA commercial

75.5% (95% CI 70.3%-80.2%)

97% (95% CI 93.7%-98.9%)

82.4% (95% CI 77.3%-86.8%)

84.5% (95% CI 78.2-89.5%)

Capture assays

82.7% (95% CI 77%-87.4%)

96% (95% CI 91.5%-98.6%)

59.3% (95% CI 45%-72.4%)

97.2% (95% CI 85.4%-99.5%)

Indirect assays

55.6% (95% CI 44%-66.6%)

100% (95% CI 93.3%-100%)

88.9% (95% CI 83.9%-92.9%)

82.6% (95% CI 75.2%-88.5%)

ELISA in house

48.6% (95% CI 35.6%-60.7%)

97.9% (95% CI 88.9%-99.6%)

88.9% (95% CI 73.9%-96.8%)

79.2% (95% CI 57.8%-92.8%)

IIF assays

56.6% (95% CI 46.2%-66.5%)

86.4% (95% CI 75.7%-93.6%)

88.9% (95% CI 81.7%-93.9%)

79.5% (95% CI 68.8%-87.8%)

IIF commercial

59.7% (95% CI 47.5%-71.1%)

97.9% (95% CI 88.9%-99.6%)

88.9% (95% CI 79.9%-94.8%)

77.7% (95% CI 64.4%-87.9%)

IIF in house

48.1% (95% CI 28.7%-68%)

55.5% (95% CI 30.8%-78.4%)

88.9% (95% CI 73.9%-96.8%)

83.3% (95% CI 62.6%-95.2%)

  1. *ELISA, IIF, and rapid test included. Due to the small number of data sets, rapid test were excluded from further analyses.