Skip to main content

Table 3 Immunological correlates of VMB clusters

From: Correlates of the molecular vaginal microbiota composition of African women

Correlates

KRST-I (n = 19)

KRST-II (n = 136)

KRST-pIII-V (n = 53)

p value*a

(in log10)

Mean (95% CI)

OR/aOR (95% CI)

Mean (95% CI)

OR (95% CI)

aOR (95% CI)

Mean (95% CI)

OR (95% CI)

aOR (95% CI)

 

IL-1α

1.08 (0.86, 1.3)

Ref

1.22 (1.14, 1.31)

1.61 (0.69, 3.77)

1.58 (0.58, 4.33)

1.64 (1.48, 1.81)

7.4 (2.63, 20.82)

11.5† (3.29, 40.22)

<0.0001

IL-1β

0.65 (0.33, 0.97)

Ref

0.83 (0.71, 0.95)

1.4 (0.72, 2.74)

-

1.34 (1.11, 1.57)

3.33 (1.58, 7.03)

-

<0.0001

IL-1rab

4.65 (4.36, 4.94)

Ref

4.83 (4.74, 4.91)

1.9 (0.76, 4.76)

-

4.87 (4.74, 5)

2.28 (0.79, 6.6)

-

0.28

IL-6

0.64 (0.33, 0.95)

Ref

0.9 (0.79, 1)

1.68 (0.85, 3.3)

-

0.9 (0.68, 1.11)

1.68 (0.8, 3.54)

-

0.31

IL-8

2.06 (1.83, 2.28)

Ref

2.19 (2.09, 2.28)

1.41 (0.62, 3.2)

-

2.25 (2.04, 2.45)

1.65 (0.68, 3.97)

-

0.54

IL-12c

0.07 (−0.18, 0.32)

Ref

0.13 (0.05, 0.21)

1.31 (0.45, 3.81)

-

0.24 (0.12, 0.35)

2.11 (0.66, 6.7)

-

0.28

IP-10

2.54 (2.36, 2.73)

Ref

2.62 (2.51, 2.73)

1.22 (0.57, 2.6)

0.98 (0.39, 2.43)

2.15 (1.93, 2.38)

0.47 (0.21, 1.06)

0.16† (0.05, 0.47)

0.0002

GM-CSF

0.26 (0.05, 0.47)

Ref

0.32 (0.25, 0.39)

1.38 (0.47, 4.03)

-

0.13 (−0.01, 0.27)

0.58 (0.19, 1.78)

-

0.0351

G-CSF

1.84 (1.57, 2.11)

Ref

1.91 (1.79, 2.02)

1.16 (0.57, 2.38)

0.71 (0.26, 1.92)

2.08 (1.93, 2.23)

1.83 (0.81, 4.15)

3.6†† (1.02, 12.73)

0.18

MIP-1βd

0.69 (0.23, 1.15)

Ref

0.94 (0.83, 1.05)

1.57 (0.84, 2.94)

1.73 (0.79, 3.82)

0.7 (0.48, 0.93)

1.02 (0.52, 1.98)

0.61 (0.25, 1.52)

0.085

  1. Abbreviations:CI confidence interval, KRST Kenya, Rwanda, South Africa, Tanzania, OR odds ratio, aOR adjusted odds ratio. For cytokine and growth factor abbreviations, we refer to the text.
  2. *One way analysis of variance test in a bivariable analysis.
  3. aSix variables qualified for inclusion in the multivariable model but only four (IL-1α, IP-10, G-CSF, and MIP-1β) variables remained in the final model after the model selection process. Although, IL-1β was highly significant in the bivariable analysis, it was eliminated during the model selection because it was highly correlated with IL-1α (Pearson’s correlation coefficient = 0.65).
  4. b19/208 values missing.
  5. cStronger evidence of association was observed when pregnant women and Tanzanian women (stage of menstrual cycle at time of sampling not known) were excluded (p = 0.09).
  6. dWeaker evidence of association was observed when pregnant women and Tanzanian women (stage of menstrual cycle at time of sampling not known) were excluded (p = 0.27).
  7. †Adjusted P-value < 0.001.
  8. ††Adjusted P-value = 0.01.