Skip to main content

Table 3 Relative risks of history of DTaP vaccination for pertussis according to case definition

From: Pertussis outbreak in university students and evaluation of acellular pertussis vaccine effectiveness in Japan

Definition of pertussis

Number

Case

Attack rate (%)

Relative risk

(95% CI)

Relative riska

(95% CI)

Probable cases

       

Less than 4 doses or no doses

23

7

30.4

1

 

1

 

4 doses

225

31

13.8

0.45

(0.23-0.91)

0.48

(0.24-0.97)

Probable + Suspected cases

       

Less than 4 doses or no doses

23

15

65.2

1

 

1

 

4 doses

225

100

44.4

0.68

(0.49-0.95)

0.70

(0.51-0.98)

Anti- PT antibody titers after outbreak ≥ 100EU/mL

       

Less than 4 doses or no doses

23

2

8.7

1

 

1

 

4 doses

225

13

5.8

0.64

(0.16-2.76)

0.64

(0.16-252)

Diagnosed as pertusis at medical institutions

       

Less than 4 doses or no doses

23

2

8.7

1

 

1

 

4 doses

225

17

7.6

0.87

(0.21-3.53)

0.74

(0.21-2.61)

  1. DTaP: diptheria, tetanus, and pertussis; CI: confidence interval; PT: pertussis toxin.
  2. Clinical criteria: (1) cough illness lasting  2 weeks; (2) paroxysms of coughing; (3) inspiratory “whoop”; (4) post-tussive vomiting.
  3. Probable case: a patient who met cough illness lasting  2 weeks with at least 1 item in the other clinical criteria.
  4. Suspected case: a patient who met at least 1 item in the above 4 clinical criteria.
  5. aAdjusted by department using the Mantel-Haenszel method.