Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Bacteriological methods as add on tests to fine-needle aspiration cytology in diagnosis of tuberculous lymphadenitis: can they reduce the diagnostic dilemma?

Original Submission
30 Apr 2014 Submitted Original manuscript
30 Apr 2014 Author responded Author comments - Gemeda Abebe
Resubmission - Version 2
30 Apr 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 2
2 May 2014 Author responded Author comments - Gemeda Abebe
Resubmission - Version 3
2 May 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 3
25 Jun 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - colleen wright
17 Jul 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Martin Dedicoat
23 Aug 2014 Author responded Author comments - Gemeda Abebe
Resubmission - Version 4
23 Aug 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 4
4 Sep 2014 Author responded Author comments - Gemeda Abebe
Resubmission - Version 5
4 Sep 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 5
29 Sep 2014 Author responded Author comments - Gemeda Abebe
Resubmission - Version 6
29 Sep 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 6
29 Sep 2014 Author responded Author comments - Gemeda Abebe
Resubmission - Version 7
29 Sep 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 7
30 Sep 2014 Author responded Author comments - Gemeda Abebe
Resubmission - Version 8
30 Sep 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 8
10 Oct 2014 Author responded Author comments - Gemeda Abebe
Resubmission - Version 9
10 Oct 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 9
23 Oct 2014 Author responded Author comments - Gemeda Abebe
Resubmission - Version 10
23 Oct 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 10
23 Oct 2014 Author responded Author comments - Gemeda Abebe
Resubmission - Version 11
23 Oct 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 11
11 Dec 2014 Author responded Author comments - Gemeda Abebe
Resubmission - Version 12
11 Dec 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 12
Publishing
15 Dec 2014 Editorially accepted
31 Dec 2014 Article published 10.1186/s12879-014-0720-z

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page