Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 6 The joined analysis of the Beijing and Guangzhou population

From: Lack of association between polymorphisms of MASP2and susceptibility to SARS coronavirus infection

  SARS cases controls    
Genotype P1 P2 C1 C2 P1 vs.P2 C1vs.C2 P1, P2 vs. C1, C2
  (n = 272) (n = 104) (n = 232) (n = 291) P P P
rs2261695        
AA 189 (70.3%) 73 (75.3%) 174 (75.0%) 193 (70.4%) 0.35 0.25 0.76
AG 77 (28.6%) 22 (22.7%) 56 (24.1%) 78 (28.5%)    
GG 3 (1.1%) 2 (2.0%) 2 (0.9%) 3 (1.1%)    
rs2273346        
TT 186 (68.4%) 64 (61.5%) 147 (63.4%) 190 (66.2%) 0.21 0.50 0.63
TC 78 (28.7%) 36 (34.6%) 71 (30.6%) 82 (28.6%)    
CC 8 (2.9%) 4 (3.8%) 14 (6%) 15 (5.2%)    
rs12711521        
TT 105 (38.5%) 58 (55.8%) 106 (45.7%) 139 (47.8%) 0.003 0.64 0.30
TG 137 (50.5%) 36 (34.6%) 95 (40.9%) 108 (37.1%)    
GG 30 (11.0%) 10 (9.6%) 31 (13.4%) 44 (15.1%)    
rs7548659        
TT 173 (69.5%) 70 (67.3%) 157 (67.7%) 205 (70.5%) 0.69 0.50 0.91
TG 61 (24.5%) 25 (24.0%) 67 (28.9%) 75 (27.8%)    
GG 15 (6.0%) 9 (8.7%) 8 (3.4%) 11 (1.7%)    
Diplotypea        
TT 344 (63.2%) 128 (61.5%) 304 (65.5%) 380 (65.3%) 0.89 1.00 0.31
TG 108 (19.9%) 42 (20.2%) 60 (12.9%) 76 (13.0%)    
CT 6 (1.1%) 4 (1.9%) 2 (0.5%) 4 (0.7%)    
CG 86 (15.8%) 34 (16.4%) 98 (21.1%) 122 (21.0%)    
  1. P1:SARS patients from Beijing; P2: SARS patients from Guangzhou; C1:controls from Beijing; C2:controls from Guangzhou.