Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 17 Jun 2007 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 27 Aug 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Philip Hill |
| 30 Aug 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Veeranoot Nissapatorn |
| 16 Sep 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Chandrashekhar Sreeramareddy |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 16 Sep 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 22 Oct 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Chandrashekhar Sreeramareddy |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 22 Oct 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 2 Nov 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Philip Hill |
| 5 Nov 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Veeranoot Nissapatorn |
| 3 Dec 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Chandrashekhar Sreeramareddy |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 3 Dec 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 30 Dec 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Veeranoot Nissapatorn |
| 17 Jan 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Chandrashekhar Sreeramareddy |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 17 Jan 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 24 Jan 2008 | Editorially accepted | |
| 24 Jan 2008 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2334-8-8 |
You can find further information about peer review here.