Skip to main content

Table 4 Head-to-head comparison between smear microscopy and phage assays

From: Bacteriophage- based tests for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical specimens: a systematic review and meta- analysis

   

Smear microscopy

Phage test

Difference (Phage – Microscopy)

Study

Year

Sample size

Sensitivity

Specificity

Sensitivity

Specificity

Sensitivity

Specificity

Commercial assays

Albay

2003

192

0.58 (0.44,0.70)

1.00 (0.97,1.00)

0.88 (0.77,0.94)

097 (0.92,0.99)

0.30

- 0.03

Albert

2002

1618

0.62 (0.55,0.69)

0.97 (0.96, 0.98)

0.72 (0.66,0.78)

0.99 (0.98,0.99)

0.10

0.02

Alcaide

2003

2048

0.73 (0.65,0.80)

0.99 (0.98,0.99)

0.58 (0.50,0.66)

0.99 (0.99,0.99)

-0.15

0

Bellen

2003

204

0.89 (0.82,0.95)

0.60 (0.50,0.70)

0.31 (0.22,0.41)

0.86 (0.78, 0.92)

- 0.58

0.26

Butt

2004

160

0.70 (0.57.0.81)

0.95 (0.89,0.998)

0.77 (0.64, 0.87)

0.96 (0.90,0.99)

0.07

0.01

Marei

2003

38

0.64 (0.31,0.89)

0.93 (0.76, 0.99)

0.55 (0.23, 0.83)

1.00 (0.87, 1.00)

-0.09

.07

Mbulo

2004

496

0.45 (0.32, 0.60)

0.98 (0.91, 1.00)

0.45 (0.32, 0.60)

0.91 (0.82, 0.96)

0

-.07

Muzaffar

2002

514

0.71 (0.65,0.77)

0,94 (0.90,0.96)

0.82 (0.76,0.86)

0.98 (0.95,0.99)

0.11

0.05

In- house assays

Mbulo

2004

115

0.48 (0.29, 0.60)

0.90 (0.81, 0.95)

0.21,(0.08,0.40)

0.91 (0.82,0.96)

-0.27

0.14

McNerney

2004

496

0.60 (0.53,0.66)

0.87(0.83,0.91)

0.44 (0.37, 0.51)

0.92 (0.89,0.95)

- 0.16

0.05