Peer Review reports
From: A double epidemic model for the SARS propagation
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 23 May 2003 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 28 May 2003 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Fred Brauer |
| 2 Jun 2003 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Richard Levins |
| 17 Jun 2003 | Author responded | Author comments - Tuen Wai Ng |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 17 Jun 2003 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 17 Jun 2003 | Author responded | Author comments - Tuen Wai Ng |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 17 Jun 2003 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 25 Jun 2003 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Fred Brauer |
| 11 Jul 2003 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Richard Levins |
| 7 Aug 2003 | Author responded | Author comments - Tuen Wai Ng |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 7 Aug 2003 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 14 Aug 2003 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Fred Brauer |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
| 22 Aug 2003 | Author responded | Author comments - Tuen Wai Ng |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 22 Aug 2003 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 10 Sep 2003 | Editorially accepted | |
| 10 Sep 2003 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2334-3-19 |
You can find further information about peer review here.