Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
22 Aug 2001 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
16 Oct 2001 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Claudia Kozinetz |
25 Oct 2001 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Manuel Olivares |
30 Nov 2001 | Author responded | Author comments - Brian Eley |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
30 Nov 2001 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
30 Nov 2001 | Author responded | Author comments - Brian Eley |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
30 Nov 2001 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
7 Feb 2002 | Author responded | Author comments - Brian Eley |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
7 Feb 2002 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
7 Feb 2002 | Author responded | Author comments - Brian Eley |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
7 Feb 2002 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
7 Feb 2002 | Author responded | Author comments - Brian Eley |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
7 Feb 2002 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
7 Feb 2002 | Author responded | Author comments - Brian Eley |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
7 Feb 2002 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
8 Feb 2002 | Author responded | Author comments - Brian Eley |
Resubmission - Version 10 | ||
8 Feb 2002 | Submitted | Manuscript version 10 |
Publishing | ||
11 Feb 2002 | Editorially accepted | |
11 Feb 2002 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2334-2-3 |
You can find further information about peer review here.