Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
23 Jul 2013 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
2 Aug 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Marja Van Wijk |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
2 Aug 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
27 Aug 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Wim van der Hoek |
4 Sep 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - D TED EASTLUND |
16 Oct 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Marja Van Wijk |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
16 Oct 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
12 Nov 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Wim van der Hoek |
26 Nov 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Marja Van Wijk |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
26 Nov 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
27 Nov 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Marja Van Wijk |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
27 Nov 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
6 Dec 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Marja Van Wijk |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
6 Dec 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
24 Dec 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
6 Jan 2014 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2334-14-6 |
You can find further information about peer review here.