Skip to main content

Table 1 Reporting criteria for gram-negative bacteria, Hesse, Germany

From: Burden of carbapenem-resistant organisms in the Frankfurt/Main Metropolitan Area in Germany 2012/2013 – first results and experiences after the introduction of legally mandated reporting

1.

Every detection of a carbapenemase by molecular methodology 1

2.

Phenotypic resistance tests (culture + antibiogram)

 

a) Pseudomonas aeruginosa

 

If resistant to all three of the following antibiotics:

 

Imipenem, meropenem and ceftazidime

 

b) Enterobacteriaceae (if not mentioned elsewhere)

 

If resistant to at least one of the following antibiotics:

 

Imipenem, meropenem or ertapenem

 

c) Proteus spp.

 

Morganella spp.

 

Providencia spp.

 

Serratia spp .

 

In case of resistance to imipenem and resistance to ertapenem or meropenem (an isolated increase of the MIC for imipenem together with normal MICs for meropenem and – if performed – for ertapenem does not require reporting)

 

d) Acinetobacter baumannii-complex

 

Enterobacter spp.

 

Citrobacter spp.

In case of resistance to imipenem or meropenem. (isolated resistance to ertapenem does not require reporting)

Not to be reported are species with intrinsic carbapenem-resistance. These include:

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia

Elizabethkingia meningoseptica

Chryseobacterium indologenes

Burkholderia cepacia

  1. 1Laboratories are encouraged but not obliged to type carbapenem-resistant bacteria, analyses are offered free of charge by the national reference centre.