Table 1 Comparison between cases with central line associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) and cases without CLABSI
From: The impact of central line insertion bundle on central line-associated bloodstream infection
Variables | No (%) of cases with CLABSI | Univariate | Multivariate |
|---|---|---|---|
Type of catheter | 0.888 | ||
Central venous catheter | 5 (0.90) | ||
Double lumen catheter | 1 (0.77) | ||
Hand hygiene | |||
Yes | 6 (0.87) | ||
No | 0 (0.0) | ||
Site of insertion | 0.679 | ||
Femoral site | 3 (2.95) | ||
Non-femoral site | 3 (0.70) | ||
Use of 2% CHG | 0.871 | ||
Yes | 6 (0.87) | ||
No | 0 (0.0) | ||
Maximal sterile barrier | 0.030 | 0.005 | |
Yes | 3 (0.50) | ||
No | 3 (3.45) | ||
Complete of four bundle | 0.416 | ||
Yes | 2 (0.53) | ||
No | 4 (0.66) | ||
Inserted by intensivists | 0.010 | 0.030 | |
Yes | 3 (0.48) | ||
No | 3 (5.00) | ||
Category | <0.001 | 0.220 | |
Medicine | 2 (0.39) | ||
Surgery | 2 (1.37) | ||
Cardiovascular | 2 (7.41) |