Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2013 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| 1 Dec 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mark Jit |
| 10 Dec 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Johannes Berkhof |
| 25 Feb 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Amber Pearson |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 25 Feb 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 12 Mar 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mark Jit |
| 27 Mar 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Johannes Berkhof |
| 14 Apr 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Amber Pearson |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 14 Apr 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 6 May 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Johannes Berkhof |
| 15 May 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mark Jit |
| 3 Jun 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Amber Pearson |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 3 Jun 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 11 Jun 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Amber Pearson |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 11 Jun 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 13 Jun 2014 | Editorially accepted | |
| 26 Jun 2014 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2334-14-351 |
You can find further information about peer review here.