Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Is expanding HPV vaccination programs to include school-aged boys likely to be value-for-money: a cost-utility analysis in a country with an existing school-girl program

Original Submission
5 Nov 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
25 Feb 2014 Author responded Author comments - Amber Pearson
1 Dec 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mark Jit
10 Dec 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Johannes Berkhof
Resubmission - Version 3
25 Feb 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 3
14 Apr 2014 Author responded Author comments - Amber Pearson
12 Mar 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mark Jit
27 Mar 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Johannes Berkhof
Resubmission - Version 4
14 Apr 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 4
3 Jun 2014 Author responded Author comments - Amber Pearson
15 May 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mark Jit
6 May 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Johannes Berkhof
Resubmission - Version 5
3 Jun 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 5
11 Jun 2014 Author responded Author comments - Amber Pearson
Resubmission - Version 6
11 Jun 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
13 Jun 2014 Editorially accepted
26 Jun 2014 Article published 10.1186/1471-2334-14-351

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page
\