Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
25 Sep 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
28 Sep 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - michael hughson |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
28 Sep 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
15 Nov 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Dalal Nemenqani |
25 Nov 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Shevanthi Nayagam |
14 Jan 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - michael hughson |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
14 Jan 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
14 Jan 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - michael hughson |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
14 Jan 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
30 Jan 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Shevanthi Nayagam |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
Publishing | ||
1 Feb 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
20 Feb 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2334-13-91 |
You can find further information about peer review here.