Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 18 Oct 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 18 Oct 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Marks |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 18 Oct 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 25 Oct 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Marks |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 25 Oct 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 26 Nov 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michael Ramharter |
| 2 Dec 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Thomas Zoller |
| 4 Dec 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Perry van Genderen |
| 11 Jan 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Marks |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 11 Jan 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 27 Jan 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Perry van Genderen |
| 30 Jan 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Thomas Zoller |
| 8 Feb 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Marks |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 8 Feb 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 27 Feb 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
| 5 Mar 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2334-13-118 |
You can find further information about peer review here.