Skip to main content

Table 5 Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for sensitivity analyses

From: Estimated health and economic impact of quadrivalent HPV (types 6/11/16/18) vaccination in Brazil using a transmission dynamic model

Parameter

Routine vaccination

Routine and a catch-up vaccination

US$ per QALYs

US$ per QALYs

Base case

219

450

Cost per year of life saved (no quality of life adjustments)

253

503

HPV16/18-related cervical diseases only

448

698

Duration of vaccine protection = 20 years

Dominated1

656

Vaccine coverage= 50% for routine and 60% for catch-up

106

250

Vaccine coverage= 95% for routine and 98% for catch-up

258

425

High cost of vaccine series (increased by 25%)

406

686

High cost of treating HPV-related disease (increased by 25%)

86

326

Low cost of treating HPV-related disease (decreased by 25%)

350

573

Discounted at 0%

Cost saving

Cost saving

Discounted at 5%

900

1201

Pessimistic scenario2

Dominated1

998

  1. 1 A strategy is “weakly” dominated if a more effective strategy has a lower incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.
  2. 2 Pessimistic scenario assumes low HPV-related disease cost (decreased by 25%), 20 years of vaccine protection, and high health utilities (0.97 for HPV-related disease).