Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
8 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
2 Apr 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Rodrigo Hasbun |
24 May 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Pepijn van den Munckhof |
6 Aug 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Cheng-Hsien Lu |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
6 Aug 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
6 Aug 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Cheng-Hsien Lu |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
6 Aug 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
13 Aug 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Pepijn van den Munckhof |
19 Aug 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Rodrigo Hasbun |
24 Aug 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Cheng-Hsien Lu |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
24 Aug 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
31 Aug 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
3 Sep 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2334-12-204 |
You can find further information about peer review here.