Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 9 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| 20 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Gijs Th. J. van Well |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 20 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| 5 Dec 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Marieke Emonts |
| 4 Jan 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Uwe Koedel |
| 10 Feb 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Gijs Th. J. van Well |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 10 Feb 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
| 21 Feb 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Uwe Koedel |
| 16 Mar 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Marieke Emonts |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
| Publishing | ||
| 27 Mar 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
| 11 May 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2334-12-112 |
You can find further information about peer review here.