Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 5 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 6 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jeff Kwong |
| 16 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Richard Pitman |
| 25 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mark Jit |
| 20 Dec 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Dena Schanzer |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 20 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 19 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mark Jit |
| 7 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jeff Kwong |
| 9 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Richard Pitman |
| 18 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Dena Schanzer |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 18 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 15 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Dena Schanzer |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 15 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 25 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Dena Schanzer |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 25 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 12 Apr 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 12 Apr 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2334-11-90 |
You can find further information about peer review here.