Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
31 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
17 Sep 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Raffaella Colombatti |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
17 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
4 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - elizabeth ashley |
29 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Stephen Graham |
21 Nov 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Raffaella Colombatti |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
21 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
8 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Stephen Graham |
23 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - elizabeth ashley |
20 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Raffaella Colombatti |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
20 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
21 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Raffaella Colombatti |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
21 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
23 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Raffaella Colombatti |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
23 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
28 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Raffaella Colombatti |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
28 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
2 Mar 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
2 Mar 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2334-11-57 |
You can find further information about peer review here.