Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
25 Jun 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
19 Jul 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - dorothy crawford |
27 Jul 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sally Glaser |
17 Sep 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Goldacre |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
17 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
13 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - dorothy crawford |
21 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sally Glaser |
17 Nov 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Goldacre |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
17 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
11 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sally Glaser |
12 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Goldacre |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
12 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
22 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sally Glaser |
28 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Goldacre |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
28 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
28 Feb 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
28 Feb 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2334-11-51 |
You can find further information about peer review here.