Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 23 Jul 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 24 Aug 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - ANNA PSAROULAKI |
| 26 Aug 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Conall McCaughey |
| 6 Oct 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Wim van der Hoek |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 6 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 5 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - ANNA PSAROULAKI |
| 12 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Wim van der Hoek |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 12 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 4 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Wim van der Hoek |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 4 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 8 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Wim van der Hoek |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 8 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
| 10 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Wim van der Hoek |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| 10 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
| Publishing | ||
| 11 Feb 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 11 Feb 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2334-11-44 |
You can find further information about peer review here.