Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
18 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
24 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Brendan Flannery |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
24 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
1 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Keith Klugman |
26 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Angel Vila-Corcoles |
19 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Brendan Flannery |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
19 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
22 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Keith Klugman |
27 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Angel Vila-Corcoles |
1 Nov 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Brendan Flannery |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
1 Nov 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
7 Nov 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Brendan Flannery |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
7 Nov 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
8 Nov 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Brendan Flannery |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
8 Nov 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
21 Nov 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
21 Nov 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2334-11-323 |
You can find further information about peer review here.