Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
18 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
29 Apr 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Cees C. van den Wijngaard |
3 May 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Giovanni Rezza |
25 Jun 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Marek Brabec |
27 Sep 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Andrew Haddow |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
27 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
18 Nov 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Andrew Haddow |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
18 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
18 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Andrew Haddow |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
18 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 9 | |
Resubmission - Version 10 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 10 | |
25 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Andrew Haddow |
Resubmission - Version 11 | ||
25 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 11 |
Publishing | ||
26 Jan 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
26 Jan 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2334-11-29 |
You can find further information about peer review here.