Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
26 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
5 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Susan Eshleman |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
5 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
4 Jul 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Eline Op de Coul |
8 Jul 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kevin Delaney |
9 Jul 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Connie Celum |
6 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Susan Eshleman |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
6 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
6 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Susan Eshleman |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
6 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
16 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Connie Celum |
29 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Eline Op de Coul |
30 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kevin Delaney |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
Publishing | ||
24 Sep 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
24 Sep 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2334-11-251 |
You can find further information about peer review here.