Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 3 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jimmy Twin |
| 21 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Janet Wilson |
| 18 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - D. Elizabeth O'Hanlon |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 18 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 3 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jimmy Twin |
| 6 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Janet Wilson |
| 12 Jul 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - D. Elizabeth O'Hanlon |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 12 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| 15 Jul 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - D. Elizabeth O'Hanlon |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 15 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 19 Jul 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 19 Jul 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2334-11-200 |
You can find further information about peer review here.