Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
1 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
7 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Philip Cooper |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
7 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
28 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Philip Cooper |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
28 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
7 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Philip Cooper |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
7 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
19 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Philip Cooper |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
19 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
27 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Philip Cooper |
Resubmission - Version 10 | ||
27 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 10 |
Publishing | ||
29 Jun 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
29 Jun 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2334-11-184 |
You can find further information about peer review here.