Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 27 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 23 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kelvin To |
| 24 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - katsumi shigemura |
| 18 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Ho Sik Shin |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 18 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 19 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kelvin To |
| 2 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - katsumi shigemura |
| 18 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Ho Sik Shin |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 18 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 1 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Ho Sik Shin |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 1 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
| 11 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Ho Sik Shin |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 11 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
| 15 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Ho Sik Shin |
| Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
| 15 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
| Publishing | ||
| 21 Apr 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 21 Apr 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2334-11-102 |
You can find further information about peer review here.