Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
5 May 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
6 May 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Pamela Hepple |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
6 May 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
31 May 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Catharina Boehme |
7 Jun 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andrew Christopher Whitelaw |
10 Jun 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mark Nicol |
14 Jul 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Pamela Hepple |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
14 Jul 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
23 Jul 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Catharina Boehme |
2 Aug 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andrew Christopher Whitelaw |
23 Aug 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Pamela Hepple |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
23 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
20 Sep 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Pamela Hepple |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
20 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
21 Sep 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Pamela Hepple |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
21 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Publishing | ||
21 Sep 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
21 Sep 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2334-10-276 |
You can find further information about peer review here.