Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
19 Aug 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
8 Oct 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - James Rubin |
8 Oct 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Helene Voeten |
9 Oct 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Anja Leppin |
18 Oct 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Onno de Zwart |
18 Feb 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Joseph Tak Fai Lau |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
18 Feb 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
22 Feb 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Joseph Tak Fai Lau |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
22 Feb 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
24 Mar 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - James Rubin |
14 Apr 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Joseph Tak Fai Lau |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
14 Apr 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
14 May 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Joseph Tak Fai Lau |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
14 May 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
24 May 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Joseph Tak Fai Lau |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
24 May 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Publishing | ||
28 May 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
28 May 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2334-10-139 |
You can find further information about peer review here.