Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Inflammatory, procoagulant markers and HIV residual viremia in patients receiving protease inhibitor monotherapy or triple drug therapy: a cross-sectional study

  • Miriam Estébanez1Email author,
  • Natalia Stella-Ascariz2,
  • Jesús Mingorance2,
  • Ignacio Pérez-Valero1,
  • Jose Ignacio Bernardino1,
  • Francisco Xavier Zamora1,
  • Maria Luisa Montes1,
  • Juan Julián González-García1 and
  • José Ramón Arribas1
BMC Infectious Diseases201414:379

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-14-379

Received: 8 April 2014

Accepted: 1 July 2014

Published: 10 July 2014



Protease inhibitor monotherapy is associated with more frequent episodes of viral rebounds above 50 copies/mL than triple therapy. Objective: To evaluate if, compared to triple-drug therapy, protease inhibitor monotherapy is associated with increased levels of inflammatory/procoagulant markers and more frequent plasma residual viremia detection.


In this cross-sectional study, we included patients treated for ≥ 1 year with darunavir/ritonavir or lopinavir/ritonavir as monotherapy (n = 72) or with two nucleos(t)ides (n = 74). All samples were tested for CRP, IL-6, fibrinogen and D-dimer. Residual viremia was determined using an ultrasensitive qualitative nested-PCR of the HIV pol gene with a limit of detection of 1 copy of HIV-RNA.


We found no differences in levels of inflammatory/procoagulant markers or in the proportion of patients with plasma residual viremia detection by treatment group.


The long-term treatment with protease inhibitor monotherapy in the setting of routine clinical practice is not associated with a higher prevalence of plasma residual viremia or more elevated inflammatory/procoagulant markers levels than triple drug therapy.


HIV Monotherapy Inflammation Residual viremia


In clinical trials, protease inhibitor (PI) monotherapy (MT) has been effective in maintaining long-term viral suppression in the majority of patients [1]. However, MT is associated with more frequent episodes of viral rebounds above 50 copies/mL than triple therapy (TT). It has been suggested that episodes of low level viremia might lead to higher levels of inflammation and procoagulant markers such as interleukin-6 (IL-6), C-reactive protein (CRP) and D-dimer.

In the MONET clinical trial [2], virologically suppressed patients were randomized to darunavir/ritonavir as MT or as TT. In a subset of patients enrolled in MONET no differences were found in IL-6 and CRP levels between the MT and TT arms in stored samples at week 144 [3]. In MONET, residual plasma viremia (RV) below 50 copies/mL was not directly measured so it remains unknown if higher levels of inflammatory/procoagulant markers are correlated with the level of RV. In the present study we sought to investigate the relationship between PI MT, levels of inflammatory/procoagulant markers and RV.


The present study is a subanalysis of a parent study comparing neurocognitive impairment in patients treated with protease inhibitor monotherapy or triple drug antiretroviral therapy. Details of this cohort and the recruitment flow-chart have been previously published [4]. We included patients who were currently receiving for ≥ 1 year lopinavir or darunavir as MT or as TT and had suppressed plasma viral load (<50 copies/ml) for at least one year. 179 patients on MT were selected, 41 patients rejected inclusion and 40 patients were screening failure. In TT group, 238 patients were selected. 49 patients rejected inclusion and 91 patients were screening failure. So, 98 patients were recruited in each group. After that, two patients on MT and three patients on TT were excluded due to HIV-1 RNA above 50 copies/ml at the initial study visit. Finally, we included 96 in the MT group and 95 patients in the TT group in the parent study. In the present study, we had available stored samples from 72 patients on MT and 74 patients on TT.

All samples were tested for CRP, IL-6, fibrinogen and D-dimer. Routine determination of viral load was done with Nuclisens EasyQ HIV-1 v2.0 (bioMeriéux, Marcy-l’Étoile, France). This technique quantifies the viral load above 20 copies/ml. At the same time-point, plasma RV was determined using an ultrasensitive qualitative nested-PCR of the HIV pol gene with a limit of detection of 1 copy of HIV-RNA. This method is based on the PCR used for single genome sequencing [5]. The local Ethics Committee for Clinical Research (La Paz University Hospital, Madrid) approved all the procedures. All participants provided written informed consent.

Sample characteristics were described using absolute and relative frequencies for categorical variables and median (IQR) for continuous variables. Chi-square test and Student’s t or the nonparametric Mann–Whitney U-test were used to compare baseline characteristics. We evaluated predictive factors of increased IL-6, CRP levels using a multivariate lineal regression model on log-transformed data. Explored factors were: age, sex, AIDS, CD4 (nadir/current), prior medical disease, hepatitis C (defined by HCV serum PCR), duration of viral suppression, detection of RV, blips (HIV RNA level > 50 copies/ml) in the last year, group of treatment, type of PI, triglycerides, total cholesterol/LDL ratio, total cholesterol/HDL ratio, HOMA index and use of statins. Variables with a p-value <0.1 in the univariate analysis, were retained in the model. All analyses were performed using the STATA statistical package (V.11.1, Stata Corporation, College Station, Texas, USA). All tests were 2-sided, p values <0.05 were considered significant.

Results and discussion

Patients were predominantly male, with a median age of 46 years, and good immune status (Table 1). Compared to the TT group, the MT group showed significantly longer duration of suppressed HIV viremia (median 7.1 versus 4.7 years, p = 0.019). The median of time on PI monotherapy was 2.6 years (IQR 1.9-3.9).
Table 1

Demographics characteristics, HIV disease status and laboratory results


Triple therapy (n = 74)

Monotherapy (n = 72)


Receiving darunavir/ritonavir. N (%)

19 (26)

27 (37.5)


Receiving abacavir. N (%)

12 (16.2)



Receiving tenofovir. N (%)

60 (81.0)



Receiving zidovudine. N (%)

2 (2.7)


Receiving lamivudine. N (%)

20 (27.0)


Receiving emtricitabine. N (%)

54 (72.9)


Male. N (%)

52 (70.3)

52 (72.2)


Age. Median (IQR)

44 (40–48)

47 (44–51)


Prior medical disease*. N (%)

27 (36.5)

36 (50)


Hepatitis C active. N (%)

18 (24.3)

14 (19.4)


AIDS. N (%)

47 (63.5)

44 (61.1)


CD4 nadir (cells/μL). Median (IQR)

141 (47–244)

172 (53–268)


Current CD4 (cells/μL). Median (IQR)

576 (417–805)

623 (457–834)


Years virologically suppressed.


   Median (IQR)

4.7 (2.9–8.9)

7.1 (4.5–8.9)




2.6 (1.9–3.9)


Patients with a single blip **. N (%)

8 (10.8)

4 (5.5)


Detectable HIV RNA (Ultrasensitive assay). N (%)

33 (44.6)

28 (38.9)


HIV RNA 20–49 copies/ml. N (%)

12 (16.2)

5 (6.9)


Triglycerides (mg/dL). Median (IQR)

149 (111–196)

189 (137–248)


LDL Cholesterol. Median (IQR)

125 (107–153)

132 (110–156)


Total Cholesterol/HDL ratio. Median (IQR)

3.8 (3.3–4.7)

4.6 (3.7–5.6)


Total Cholesterol/LDL ratio. Median (IQR)

1.6 (1.5–1.8)

1.6 (1.5–1.8)


Receiving statins. N (%)

17 (25.4)

16 (24)


HOMA index. Median (IQR)

1.7 (1.0–2.7)

2.1 (1.3–3.4)


CRP level(mg/L).Median (IQR)

0.9 (0–2.4)

1.3 (0–2.8)


CRP ≥5 mg/L. N (%)

5 (6.8)

10 (14.5)


IL-6 (pg/ml).



1.9 (1.2–3.4)

1.7 (1.3–3)


   IL-6 ≥ 3 pg/ml. N (%)

17 (23)

18 (25)


Fibrinogen (mg/dl). Median (IQR)

386 (351–452)

398 (362–447)


D-dimer (ng/ml). Median (IQR)

131 (99–214)

137 (99–234)


Medical disease: hypertension, dyslipaemia, diabetes mellitus, ischemic heart disease, heart insufficiency, chronic renal failure, thyroid disorders and peripheral arterial disease*. Blip: detection of RNA-HIV > 50 copies/ml in the last year**. NA: non applicable.

We found no differences in levels of inflammatory/procoagulant markers between groups of treatment. Specifically we have not found differences in IL-6 levels ≥3 pg/mL and CRP levels ≥ 5 mg which have been associated with higher rates of progression to AIDS or death and an increased cardiovascular risk [6, 7]. These results are comparable to those of the MONET trial [3]. In the multivariate analysis, the variables significantly associated with increased IL-6 level were male gender (p = 0.017), older age (p = 0.009) and active hepatitis C (p = 0.043) and the variable significantly associated to increased CRP levels was the HOMA index (p = 0.030). Hepatitis C coinfection was also associated with higher IL-6 level in the MONET trial [3]. Overall, there was a significant weak correlation between higher IL-6 levels and higher CRP levels (correlation coefficient = 0.35, p < 0.001). The detection of RV was similar in both groups of treatment (44.6% in TT group vs. 38.9% in MT group, p = 0.484). The percentage of patients with viral load 20–49 copies/ml was higher in triple therapy group (p = 0.081). There were no differences in inflammatory/procoagulant markers or detection of RV between patients receiving MT with Lopinavir/r or Darunavir/r.

We have found that the use of PI MT in routine clinical practice, compared to TT, is not associated to higher levels of inflammatory or procoagulant markers. Interestingly, as in prior studies [3, 8] hepatitis C coinfection was significantly associated to higher IL-6 level.

In our study, plasma RV -detectable in nearly half of patients- was not more frequent in patients receiving MT. In the “Only Kaletra” pilot trial [9] the level of RV did not increase after switching from TT to lopinavir/ritonavir MT. In the MONET clinical trial the percentage of patients with HIV RNA <5 copies/mL remained constant over time without differences between MT and TT [10]. In the MONOI trial, among patients with viral load <50 copies/ml at week 48 there was no difference in the proportions of patients with HIV RNA < 1 copy/mL at week 48 [11]. Taken together these results do not suggest that MT is associated with more frequent detection of RV.

Our study did not show an association between detection of RV and higher levels of inflammatory/procoagulant markers. In the study by Chun et al. [12] RV was detected in 63% of virologically suppressed patients with no association with increased levels of inflammatory/procoagulant markers. In the FRAM cohort, there was little association of low-level viremia with levels of CRP, IL-6 and fibrinogen. Only in patients with viral loads above 10,000 HIV-RNA copies/mL there was an association with increased IL-6 levels [13].

Our study has the intrinsic limitations of cross-sectional analyses. We compared MT and TT in a selected group of patients, who have maintained long-term virological suppression and results cannot be extrapolated to other types of patients. However this limitation is inherent to the fact that MT is only indicated in adherent patients with suppressed viral load [14]. The time on viral suppression was significantly longer in the MT group, which could have decreased the possibility of detection of residual viremia in this group. However, the duration of viral suppression and the group the treatment were not significantly associated with increased levels of IL-6 and CRP in the multivariate analysis.


In summary, our study suggests that long-term treatment with darunavir/ritonavir or lopinavir/ritonavir MT in the setting of routine clinical practice is not associated with a higher prevalence of plasma RV or more elevated inflammatory/procoagulant markers levels than triple drug therapy.


Authors’ Affiliations

HIV Unit, Internal Medicine Service, Hospital Universitario La Paz
Microbiology Service, Hospital Universitario La Paz


  1. Mathis S, Khanlari B, Pulido F, Schechter M, Negredo E, Nelson M, Vernazza P, Cahn P, Meynard JL, Arribas J, Bucher HC: Effectiveness of protease inhibitor monotherapy versus combination antiretroviral maintenance therapy: a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2011, 6: e22003-10.1371/journal.pone.0022003.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Arribas JR, Horban A, Gerstoft J, Fätkenheuer G, Nelson M, Clumeck N, Pulido F, Hill A, van Delft Y, Stark T, Moecklinghoff C: The MONET trial: darunavir/ritonavir with or without nucleoside analogues, for patients with HIV RNA below 50 copies/ml. AIDS. 2010, 24: 223-230. 10.1097/QAD.0b013e3283348944.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Arribas JR, Hill A, Xi N, Van Delft Y, Moecklinghoff C: Interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein levels after 3 years of treatment with darunavir/ritonavir monotherapy or darunavir/ritonavir + two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors in the MONET trial. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012, 67: 1804-1806. 10.1093/jac/dks102.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Pérez-Valero I, González-Baeza A, Estébanez M, Montes-Ramírez ML, Bayón C, Pulido F, Bernardino JI, Zamora FX, Monge S, Gaya F, Lagarde M, Rubio R, Hernando A, Arnalich F, Arribas JR: Neurocognitive impairment in patients treated with protease inhibitor monotherapy or triple drug antiretroviral therapy. PLoS ONE. 2013, 8: e69493-10.1371/journal.pone.0069493.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Palmer S, Kearney M, Maldarelli F, Halvas EK, Bixby CJ, Bazmi H, Rock D, Falloon J, Davey RT, Dewar RL, Metcalf JA, Hammer S, Mellors JW, Coffin JM: Multiple, linked human immunodeficiency virus type 1 drug resistance mutations in treatment-experienced patients are missed by standard genotype analysis. J Clin Microbiol. 2005, 43: 406-10.1128/JCM.43.1.406-413.2005.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Rodger AJ, Fox Z, Lundgren JD, Kuller LH, Boesecke C, Gey D, Skoutelis A, Goetz MB, Phillips AN, INSIGHT Strategies for Management of Antiretroviral Therapy (SMART) Study Group: Activation and coagulation biomarkers are independent predictors of the development of opportunistic disease in patients with HIV Infection. J Infect Dis. 2009, 200: 973-983. 10.1086/605447.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Kalayjian RC, Machekano RN, Rizk N, Robbins GK, Gandhi RT, Rodriguez BA, Pollard RB, Lederman MM, Landay A: Pretreatment levels of soluble cellular receptors and interleukin 6 are associated with HIV disease progression in subjects treated with highly active antiretroviral therapy. J Infect Dis. 2010, 201: 1796-1805. 10.1086/652750.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Salter ML, Lau B, Mehta SH, Go VF, Leng S, Kirk GD: Correlates of elevated interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein in persons with or at high-risk for HCV and HIV infections. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013, [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
  9. McKinnon JE, Arribas JR, Pulido F, Delgado R, Mellors JW: The level of persistent HIV viremia does not increase after successful simplification of maintenance therapy to lopinavir/ritonavir alone. AIDS. 2006, 20: 2331-2335. 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32801189f6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Clumeck N, Rieger A, Banhegyi D, Schmidt W, Hill A, Van Delft Y, Moecklinghoff C, Arribas J: 96 week results from the MONET trial: a randomized comparison of darunavir/ritonavir with versus without nucleoside analogues, for patients with HIV RNA. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011, 66: 1878-1885. 10.1093/jac/dkr199.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Lambert-Niclot S, Flandre P, Valantin MA, Peytavin G, Duvivier C, Haim-Boukobza S, Algarte-Genin M, Yazdanpanah Y, Girard PM, Katlama C, Calvez V, Marcelin AG: Factors associated with virological failure in HIV-1-infected patients receiving darunavir/ritonavir monotherapy. J Infect Dis. 2011, 204: 1211-1216. 10.1093/infdis/jir518.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Chun TW, Murray D, Justement JS, Hallahan CW, Moir S, Kovacs C, Fauci AS: Relationship between residual plasma viremia and the size of HIV proviral DNA reservoirs in infected individuals receiving effective antiretroviral therapy. J Infect Dis. 2011, 204: 135-138. 10.1093/infdis/jir208.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Eastburn A, Scherzer R, Zolopa AR, Benson C, Tracy R, Do T, Bacchetti P, Shlipak M, Grunfeld C, Tien PC: Association of low level viremia with inflammation and mortality in HIV-infected adults. PLoS ONE. 2011, 6: e26320-10.1371/journal.pone.0026320.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. EACS: GuidelinesVersion 7.0. 2013, (accessed 18 Oct 2013)Google Scholar
  15. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:


© Estébanez et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.