Skip to main content

Table 1 Population distribution by levels of community utilization of malaria control interventions, Sudan 2016

From: Impact of malaria control interventions on malaria infection and anaemia in low malaria transmission settings: a cross-sectional population-based study in Sudan

Proportion of the population living in areas with specified community-level utilization of malaria interventions

Level of community utilization of interventions

Low (< 40%)

Average (40 to < 60%)

High (60 to < 80%)

Effective (≥ 80%) [30]

Mean (SD)

95% CI of the mean

Malaria diagnosis [in %, Total = 25,877]

68.7%

18.5%

10.4%

2.4%

31.5% (22.3)

29.0–34.0

ACTs [in %, Total = 20,763]

63.5%

21.9%

6.8%

7.9%

29.9% (29.3)

26.2–33.7

LLINs [in %, Total = 24,883]

61.1%

17.7%

13.5%

7.7%

35.7% (25.6)

32.8–38.6

  1. Totals in this table are the total number of individuals living in areas where specified malaria intervention utilization was assessed. Variation in totals is because some clusters (with their study population) were not eligible for specified intervention assessment i.e., no case of fever was reported (malaria diagnosis eligibility) or none was tested positive (ACTs eligibility)
  2. 95% CI 95% confidence interval, SD Standard Deviation, ACTs artemisinin-based combination therapies, LLINs long-lasting insecticidal nets