Skip to main content

Table 2 Percentage of antibiotics’ sensitivity toward different bacteria in Hospital “A” before and after the implementation of Antimicrobial Stewardship Program

From: Impact of antimicrobial stewardship on antibiogram, consumption and incidence of multi drug resistance

Bacteria

Number of cultures

Percentage of sensitive cultures for each antibiotic

P-value to compare between pre and one year after

P-value to compare between one year and two years after

One year before application of AMS program

One year after application of AMS program

Two year after application of AMS program

One year before application of AMS program

One year after application of AMS program

Two year after application of AMS program

E. coli

456

355

324

Piperacillin/tazobactam

0.632

0.461

80

82

85

Cefuroxime

0.477

48

48

50

Ceftazidime

0.7

0.705

48

49

50

Ertapenem

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

93

69

94

Imipenem

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

93

69

94

Gentamycin

0.002

0.709

69

79

77

Amikacin

0.077

0.18

97

99

97

Ciprofloxacin

1

1

53

54

53

Tigecycline

0.405

95

97

97

TMP/SMX

1

0.74

41

43

45

Klebsiella pneumonia

140

75

88

Piperacillin/tazobactam

0.442

0.542

63

68

76

Cefuroxime

0.627

45

51

51

Ceftazidime

0.755

0.864

42

48

51

Ertapenem

< 0.001

< 0.001

79

84

86

Imipenem

1

0.815

79

84

86

Gentamycin

0.229

0.152

75

64

76

Amikacin

0.581

0.774

92

89

91

Ciprofloxacin

0.006

0.458

47

73

69

Tigecycline

0.405

81

84

90

TMP/SMX

0.533

0.652

56

57

51

Pseudomonas aeruginosa

95

41

51

Piperacillin/tazobactam

0.629

0.07

75

80

94

Ceftazidime

0.774

78

78

84

Imipenem

1

0.092

62

71

82

Gentamycin

0.424

73

73

86

Amikacin

0.774

0.754

84

83

88

Ciprofloxacin

0.096

0.503

67

56

69

Acinetobacter

65

20

26

Tigecycline

0.227

0.388

69

50

65

Enterobacter

33

20

12

Piperacillin/tazobactam

0.549

 

54

60

100

Cefuroxime

0.18

0.18

36

50

83

Ceftazidime

0.289

0.219

36

50

83

Ertapenem

1

0.375

72

75

99

Imipenem

1

0.625

72

75

99

Gentamycin

0.289

0.625

63

80

99

Ciprofloxacin

0.344

1

54

80

75

TMP/SMX ( Trimethoprim / Sulfamethoxazole)

0.004

0.375

27

65

50

Proetus mirabilis

30

21

15

Cefuroxime

0.727

1

73

76

67

Piperacillin/tazobactam

0.549

1

54

60

100

Ceftazidime

1

1

73

76

67

Imipenem

1

1

6

10

13

Gentamycin

0.727

0.462

53

57

60

Amikacin

0.625

1

93

86

93

Ciprofloxacin

0.581

1

50

62

76

TMP-SMX

1

1

36

43

47

S. aureus

97

81

80

Oxacillin

0.337

0.87

39

31

29

Piperacillin/tazobactam

 

0.86

 

31

29

Gentamycin

0.458

0.071

87

88

85

Ciprofloxacin

0.093

0.004

72

79

64

TMP-SMX ( Trimethoprim / Sulfamethoxazole)

0.629

0.815

88

77

94

Clindamycin

0.487

1

61

65

66

Rifampin

0.388

0.549

91

95

91

E. faecalis

48

30

30

Ciprofloxacin

0.087

54

60

60

Vancomycin

0.002

0.871

87

93

100

Teicoplanin

< 0.001

0.851

87

93

100

E. faecium

22

2

10

Ciprofloxacin

1

1

18

50

36

Strep. Viridians

25

15

11

Ciprofloxacin

0.727

1

60

70

80

Piperacillin/tazobactam

1

 

75

80

Total number of cases with improved antibiotics’ sensitivity

When comparing 1 year before AMS and 1 year after: 6

When comparing 1 year after and 2 years after AMS: 3

Total number of cases with decreased antibiotics’ sensitivity

When comparing 1 year before AMS and 1 year after: 2

When comparing 1 year after and 2 years after AMS: 1

  1. Statistically significant values are shown in bold