Skip to main content

Table 2B The weight of each investigated tissue sample of all subjects and in case of PJI its effect on the rate of positive culture results using Disperser vs. Bead milling method

From: Evaluation of two different semi-automated homogenization techniques in microbiological diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection: disperser vs. bead milling method

 

Proportion of investigated samples based on weight

 

PJI1 Culture positive (n = 34)

> 1.5 g

0.5-1.5 g

< 0.5 g

All sizes

Disperser (no. of positive cultures/

total no. of specimens [%])

71/87 (82)

41/53 (77)

8/13 (62)

120/153 (78)

Bead milling (no. of positive cultures/ total no. of specimens [%])

72/90 (80)

37/48 (77)

12/17 (71)

121/155 (78)

PJI1 Culture negative (n = 6)

    

Disperser (no. [%])

18 (64)

7 (25)

3 (11)

27

Bead milling (no. [%])

15 (56)

7 (26)

5 (18)

27

AF2 (n = 40)

    

Disperser (no. [%])

89 (49)

66 (37)

25 (14)

180

Bead milling (no. [%])

90 (50)

64 (36)

26 (14)

180

  1. 1Periprosthetic joint infection; 2Aseptic failure