Inconsistency analysis between metagenomic next-generation sequencing results of cerebrospinal fluid and clinical diagnosis with suspected central nervous system infection

Table 2 Comparison of sensitivity and specificity between mNGS, conventional methods, and clinical diagnosis

	Sensitivity	Specificity
mNGS/conventional methods	90.91% (10/11)	63.33% (19/30)
mNGS/clinical diagnosis	54.84% (17/31)	60.00% (6/10)
Conventional methods/clinical diagnosis	32.26% (10/31)	90.00% (9/10)

ISSN: 1471-2334