Skip to main content

Table 1 Socio-demographic characteristics and prevalence of anal HPV infection among HIV-positive males in Taizhou, China

From: Increased CD4+ T cell count is associated with lower anal human papillomavirus prevalence among HIV-positive male cohort in Taizhou, China: a cross-sectional study

 

Overall

Any HPV positive

Any HR-HPV positive

Any LR-HPV positive

Number

Proportion %

Number

Prevalence %

Number

Prevalence %

Number

Prevalence %

Total

766

100

373

48.7

309

40.3

173

22.6

Age (years)

   

P = 0.009

 

P < 0.001

 

P < 0.001

 18–24

33

4.4

19

57.6

18

54.6

8

24.2

 25–34

150

20.1

84

56.0

71

47.3

52

34.7

 35–44

152

20.3

70

46.1

59

38.8

32

21.1

 45–54

202

27.0

105

52.0

91

45.1

46

22.8

 55–82

211

28.2

82

38.9

58

27.5

29

13.7

 Missing

18

       

Level of education

   

P = 0.019

 

P < 0.001

 

P < 0.001

 Illiterate or primary school

211

28.2

83

39.3

58

27.5

25

11.9

 Middle school

315

42.0

159

50.5

137

43.5

83

26.4

 High school

140

18.7

71

50.7

63

45.0

34

24.3

 College or above

83

11.1

47

56.6

39

47.0

26

31.3

 Missing

17

       

Marital status

   

P = 0.002

 

P < 0.001

 

P = 0.002

 Never married

250

33.4

142

56.8

122

48.8

75

30.0

 Currently married

365

48.7

154

42.2

117

32.1

65

17.8

 Widowed/divorced

134

17.9

64

47.8

58

43.3

28

20.9

 Missing

17

       

Sexual orientation

   

P < 0.001

 

P < 0.001

 

P < 0.001

 Hetero-sexual

406

54.0

160

39.4

112

27.6

50

12.3

 Homo-sexual

263

35.0

157

59.7

146

55.5

97

36.9

 Bi-sexual or uncertain

83

11.0

52

62.7

49

59.0

24

28.9

 Missing

14

       

Self-reported history of STIs

   

P = 0.048

 

P = 0.007

 

P = 0.009

 No

503

73.5

232

46.1

187

37.2

102

20.3

 Yes

181

26.5

99

54.7

88

48.6

54

29.8

 Missing

82

       

Multiple sex partnersa

   

P = 0.770

 

P = 0.753

 

P = 0.090

 No

49

6.5

25

51.0

21

42.9

16

32.7

 Yes

700

93.5

342

48.9

284

40.6

155

22.1

 Missing

17

       

Condom usea

   

P = 0.027

 

P = 0.006

 

P = 0.062

 Yes

8

1.0

7

87.5

7

87.5

4

50.0

 No

758

99.0

366

48.3

302

39.8

169

22.3

 Missing

0

       

Baseline CD4+ T (cells/µL)

   

P = 0.883

 

P = 0.947

 

P = 0.860

  < 200

265

35.0

127

47.9

103

38.9

56

21.1

 200–349

310

41.0

153

49.4

128

41.3

68

21.9

 350–499

120

15.9

56

46.7

48

40.0

30

25.0

  ≥ 500

61

8.1

32

52.5

25

41.0

13

21.3

 Missing

10

       

Current CD4+ T (cells/µL)

   

P = 0.091

 

P = 0.086

 

P = 0.851

  < 200

88

12.1

51

58.0

47

53.4

21

23.9

 200–349

192

26.5

99

51.6

74

38.5

44

22.9

 350–499

175

24.2

75

42.9

69

39.4

36

20.6

  ≥ 500

270

37.2

126

46.7

106

39.3

65

24.1

 Missing

41

       

Change of CD4+ Tb (cells/µL)

   

P = 0.033

 

P = 0.093

 

P = 0.578

 Decreased or unchanged

136

19.0

77

56.6

64

47.1

28

20.6

 Increased

579

81.0

269

46.5

227

39.2

132

22.8

 Missing

51

       

cART

   

P = 0.417

 

P = 0.298

 

P = 0.157

 EFV + 3TC + TDF

366

49.4

186

50.8

151

41.3

82

22.4

 EFV + 3TC + AZT

186

25.1

92

49.5

80

43.0

46

24.7

 NVP + 3TC + AZT

124

16.7

54

43.6

41

33.1

19

15.3

 Others combined

65

8.8

28

43.1

24

36.9

18

27.7

 Missing

25

       

Duration of cART (years)

   

P = 0.017

 

P = 0.025

 

P = 0.201

  < 2

300

40.5

163

54.3

135

45.0

76

25.3

 2– < 5

268

36.2

126

47.0

105

39.2

57

21.3

  ≥ 5

173

23.3

71

41.0

56

32.4

32

18.5

 Missing

25

       
  1. HR-HPV high-risk HPV, LR-HPV low-risk HPV, STIs sexually transmitted infections, cART combined antiretroviral therapy (741 participants were under cART), EFV Efavirenz, 3TC Lamivudine, TDF Tenofovir, AZT Zidovudine, NVP Nevirapine
  2. aLife-time multiple sex partners; condom use in the last 6 months
  3. bThe change of CD4 + T cell counts was calculated by current CD4 minus baseline CD4. If the result was positive, it was defined as “increased CD4 + T cell counts”; and if the result was negative or zero, it was defined as “decreased or unchanged CD4 + T cell counts”