Controversy | Main view and raised arguments | Main view and raised arguments |
---|---|---|
1. Urogenital testing | Widely implement testing in asymptomatic key populations/communities | Reduce testing of asymptomatic women and MSM |
 | 1.1. In women, urogenital CT is prevalent, easily transmitted, and may cause complications | 1.3. Test implementation in ‘real-life’ does not achieve the desired benefits (of reducing prevalence and avoiding complications) |
 | 1.2.With resources available, CT is easy to test | 1.4.Testing may also bring harm |
2. Extragenital testing | Test more to reveal missed extragenital infections | Reduce testing of asymptomatic CT with limited ‘relevance’ |
 | 2.1. CT can occur at the pharyngeal and rectal sites in women and MSM | 2.3. Rectal CT might not always reflect a ‘true’ infection in women |
 | 2.2. Rectal CT may comprise a ‘hidden’ reservoir of transmissible infections in women and MSM, and increase the risk for HIV acquisition and transmission in MSM | 2.4. Clinical impact of pharyngeal or rectal (non-LGV) CT may be limited |
3. Treatment | Use azithromycin | Use doxycycline |
 | 3.1. Azithromycin is easy to use, safe, and widely applicable | 3.3. The risk of azithromycin treatment failure is high in rectal CT |
 | 3.2. Azithromycin is effective in curing urogenital and pharyngeal CT | 3.4. Treatment, especially azithromycin, can cause AMR |