Table 3 Node analysis of direct and indirect comparisons among interventions
Category | Direct | Indirect | Difference | P | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Coef | 95% CI | Coef | 95% CI | Coef | 95% CI | ||
BIC vs DTG | − 0.162 | (− 1.47,1.15) | 1.105 | (− 3.40,5.61) | − 1.267 | (− 5.96,3.43) | 0.597 |
BIC vs EVG | − 0.76 | (− 3.03,1.51) | − 1.504 | (− 3.43,0.43) | 0.744 | (− 2.24,3.73) | 0.625 |
DTG vs EVG | − 1.16 | (− 2.19,-0.13) | − 0.752 | (− 4.34,2.83) | − 0.408 | (− 4.14,3.32) | 0.831 |
DTG vs RAL | − 0.795 | (− 1.82,0.23) | 0.472 | (− 4.11,5.05) | − 1.267 | (− 5.96,3.43) | 0.597 |
EVG vs RAL | 0.463 | (− 0.69,1.61) | − 0.113 | (− 3.20,2.97) | 0.576 | (− 2.72,3.87) | 0.732 |