Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparison of scoring system performance in predicting bacteraemia

From: Comparison of different sepsis scoring systems and pathways: qSOFA, SIRS, Shapiro criteria and CEC SEPSIS KILLS pathway in bacteraemic and non-bacteraemic patients presenting to the emergency department

Scoring system

Bacteraemic (n = 251)

Non bacteraemic (n = 251)

Area under ROC curve

Sensitivity

Specificity

Clinical predictive value

Positive

Negative

Positive

Negative

qSOFA

50

201

41

210

0.517 95% CI (0.4—0.56)

19.82 95% CI (15.16–25.4)

83.67 95% CI (78.50–88.02)

PPV 55%

NPV 49%

SIRS

206

45

200

51

0.514 95% CI (0.46—0.56)

82.07 95% CI (76.76–86.61)

20.72 95% CI (15.88–26.26)

PPV 45%

NPV 54%

SHAPIRO

221

30

154

95

0.627 95% CI (0.58–0.68)

88.05 95% CI (83.38–91.79)

37.85 95% CI (31.82–44.16

PPV 60%

NPV 76%