Skip to main content

Table 2 Univariate and multivariate regression analyses of screening completion

From: Fewer losses in the cascade of care for latent tuberculosis with solo interferon-gamma release assay screening compared to sequential screening

 

No. total

No. completing screening

OR (95% CI)

p-valuea

aOR (95% CI)

p-value

Gender

 Male

255

176

Reference

 

Reference

 

 Female

216

150

1.03 (0.70,1.53)

0.871

1.10 (0.72, 1.69)

0.661

Refugee status

 Refugee claimant

95

42

Reference

 

Reference

 

 Privately-sponsored

225

185

5.69 (3.36, 9.65)

 < 0.001

2.81 (1.53, 5.15)

0.001

 Government-assisted

151

99

2.40 (1.42, 4.07)

0.001

1.38 (0.76, 2.49)

 

Origin, by TB incidence

 Low/Intermediate incidence country

278

201

Reference

 

Reference

 

 High incidence country

193

125

0.69 (0.47, 1.03)

0.069

0.86 (0.55, 1.36)

0.524

Screening test

 Sequential

240

129

Reference

 

Reference

 

 Solo-QFT

231

197

4.84 (3.12, 7.52)

 < 0.001

3.74 (2.30, 6.09)

 < 0.001

  1. No. number, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, aOR adjusted odds ratio, QFT quantiferon Gold Plus;
  2. aSignificant value defined as p ≤ 0.05; Log likelihood = − 250.43577, p-value final model = 0.000, No. of observations in final model = 467