Skip to main content

Table 3 Demographics and Social Network Estimates for Index Individuals stratified by Index Type and Sex

From: Association between tuberculosis in men and social network structure in Kampala, Uganda

  Female Male Sig
Case
n = 39
Control
n = 39
Case
n = 84
Control
n = 85
Age \(25.6 (\pm 0.89)\) \(28.0 (\pm 1.11)\) \(32.9 (\pm 1.16)\) 33.8 \((\pm 1.08)\) *
Monogamous or polygamous relationship 12 (0.31) 22 (0.56) 28 (0.33) 48 (0.57) **
Node position
 Degree \(10.4 (\pm 0.70)\) \(9.95 (\pm 0.4)\) \(10.8 (\pm 0.4)\) \(10.3 (\pm 0.5)\)  
 Closeness 0.077 \((\pm 0.002)\) \(0.076 (\pm 0.003)\) 0.075 \((\pm 0.002)\) \(0.078 (\pm 0.002)\)  
 Betweenness 0.005 (\(\pm 0.001)\) \(0.015 (\pm 0.003)\) \(0.010 (\pm 0.002)\) \(0.022 (\pm 0.003)\) **
 Distance to case \(3.4 (\pm 0.3)\) \(3.8 (\pm 0.3)\) \(3.0 (\pm 0.2)\) \(3.3 (\pm 0.2)\)  
Mixing variables
 Proportion of all contacts with adult men \(0.34 (\pm 0.04)\) \(0.22 (\pm 0.02)\) \(0.53 (\pm 0.03)\) \(0.43 (\pm 0.03)\) *,**
 Proportion of all contacts with adult women \(0.41 (\pm 0.04)\) \(0.44 (\pm 0.03)\) \(0.35 (\pm 0.02)\) \(0.38 (\pm 0.02)\) *
 aProportion of all contacts with children \(0.26 (\pm 0.03)\) \(0.34 (\pm 0.03)\) \(0.12 (\pm 0.02)\) \(0.19 (\pm 0.02)\) *,**
 bProportion of all contacts occurring within HH \(0.31 (\pm 0.04)\) 0.45 \((\pm 0.04)\) 0.19 \(\left(\pm 0.02\right)\) \(0.33 (\pm 0.03)\) *,**
 Proportion of HH contacts occurring with children 0.32 \((\pm 0.04)\) 0.39 \((\pm 0.03)\) 0.25 \((\pm 0.02)\) 0.29 \((\pm 0.02)\) *
  1. Values indicate the number of individuals (proportion) or mean (\(\pm\) standard errors) for each variable
  2. aAdults \(\ge\) 15 years old, children \(<\) 15
  3. bHH: Household
  4. *Significant difference (p < 0.05) between means by index sex (male, female)
  5. **Significant difference (p < 0.05) between means by index type (case, control)