Skip to main content

Table 7 Risk of bias assessment of included studies

From: Reducing burden from respiratory infections in refugees and immigrants: a systematic review of interventions in OECD, EU, EEA and EU-applicant countries

 

Using ROBINS-I-tool for non-randomised studies of cohort-type // Risk of bias due to:

Author (year of publication)

Confounding

Selection of participants

Classification of interventions

Deviation from intended interventions

Missing data

Measurement of outcomes

Selection of reported result

Overall judgement

De Vallière et al. (2011) [69]

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Pallasch et al. (2005) [67]

Moderate

Moderate

Low

Low

Moderate

Moderate

Moderate

Moderate

Brockmann et al. (2016) [68]

Serious

Moderate

Low

Low

Moderate

Moderate

Serious

Serious

Koop et al. (2001) [66]

Serious

Low

Moderate

Moderate

Low

Low

Serious

Serious

Coady et al. (2008) [58]

Moderate

Low

Low

Low

Low

Moderate

Low

Moderate

Hoppe et al. (2011) [60]

Serious

Serious

Low

Low

Critical

Serious

Serious

Critical

Rodriguez-Rieiro et al. (2011) [59]

Critical

Critical

Critical

Serious

Moderate

Moderate

Critical

Critical

Larson et al. (2009) [56]

Serious

Low

Moderate

Low

Serious

Serious

Serious

Serious

 

Using RoB 2.0 for cluster-randomised parallel group trials of intervention // Risk of bias due to

 

Randomisation process

Timing of identification and recruitment of individual participants in relation to timing of randomisation

Deviations from intended interventions

Missing outcome data

Measurement of outcomes

Selection of reported result

Overall judgement

Larson et al. (2010) [57]

Low [O1-O4]

Low [O1-O4]

Some concerns [O1-O4]

Low [O1-O4]

Some concerns [O1-O4]

Low [O1-O4]

Some concerns [O1-O4]